I'm
no longer one to engage in debates on race in the entertainment
industry. Yes, it's glaringly and laughably disingenuousness,
slapping a Diversity Disclaimer on a casting breakdown while
specifying that the leads MUST be Caucasian, but I also realize that
I live in a time where there are more Black, Latino, and Asian faces
in the popular consciousness than ever before. And I celebrate that,
and find it highly encouraging. So what I'm about to write in
response to Kelley L. Carter's hugely problematic article The Rise
of the Black British Actor will not focus on that aspect. What it
will focus on is Ms. Carter's and Ava DuVernay's disappointing
ignorance regarding American actor training in general—an ignorance
that white actors have dealt with for decades and is now poisoning
the Black artist's well.
On
January 5th, 2015, at 2:11pm, Buzzfeed Reporter Kelley L.
Carter posted an article called “The
Rise of the Black British Actor”. It is, essentially, a profile
of actor David Oyelowo, and a promotional piece for the new film
Selma, but it also reads as a paean to British Actor Training;
exactly what British Actor Training is is not clearly defined, which leads me to
believe that neither Ms. Carter nor Ms. DuVernay really know what
they are talking about.
To
borrow a British term, let's “take the piss” out of this column,
a piece at a time, shall we?
“So
seven years ago, [Oyelowo] and his wife Jessica made the decision to
head to Los Angeles, with the hope being that he’d find the type of
work fitting for his training at the esteemed London Academy of Music
and Dramatic Art.”
We're
currently in a Golden Age of Television (mostly cable television),
and extraordinary movies do get made, and have been made for quite
some time, but I don't know of any actor with elite conservatory
training that regards Los Angeles as a mecca for work befitting that
training. It sounds condescending, but once you've spent several
years working on material written by the greatest writers of the past 500 years, a guest spot on [insert generic
episodic show here] seems lacking by comparison. Just saying.
“I’m sorry — they were just really good!” [Ava] DuVernay mock-wailed in defense of her casting British actors during a recent interview with BuzzFeed News. “David is just an extraordinary artist. He is unlike anything I’ve come across in terms of his depth of his preparation, the openness of his heart with this part — totally sinking in and a desire to disappear into this, to give his whole self over to it. That level of commitment is the kind of thing you hear when you read Premiere magazine articles about Daniel Day-Lewis preparing. I would see it happen. And know how important it was to him. And to be a partner with him in this performance was just an honor, and at that point, you could be any nationality.”
Earlier
in the article Ms. Carter wrote that Mr. Oyelowo was given the script
seven years ago (albeit in a different version). I would certainly
hope that, in that span of time, Mr. Oyelowo had deigned to do a bit
of homework.
"Still, there is something to be said about the technical training that many actors receive in England."
But
nothing to be said, apparently, for the technical training that many
actors receive at institutions like NYU, Yale, and Juilliard, here in
the United States. I'm actually not sure what the term “technical
training” even means, and I'm willing to bet that Kelley Carter of
Buzzfeed doesn't know what it means, either.
“But it’s more than just the actors navigating across the Atlantic to find great work. They’re winning these roles because many of them are able to utilize their U.K. theater backgrounds and translate them to major Hollywood productions, something that works quite well with the deeply constructed roles many are landing.”
This
is confusing. Outside of cultural tastes, I'm not sure what's
different about doing theatre in the UK versus doing theatre here in
the United States. Also, earlier in the article Ms. Carter suggested
that the reason that we're experiencing this Afro-British Actor Boom
is because they could not find sufficient meaningful work at home in
Britain. So how could these actors have gained a strong grounding in
theatre if they couldn't find the work needed to gain a strong
grounding in theatre?
And
since when does theatre training guarantee success in Hollywood? I
and many of my colleagues have extensive New York stage credits and
have worked at many of the nation's top theatres. In fact as I write
this I'm just about to close a run at Washington, D.C.'s esteemed
Shakespeare Theatre Company, where my Caliban has been
extraordinarily well-received.
By
Ms. Carter's logic, shouldn't I be a movie star by now?
“'I think there’s something about the stage, because they have that stage preparation,' DuVernay said. 'Their work is really steeped in theater. Our system of creating actors is a lot more commercial. … there’s a depth in the character building that’s really wonderful.'”
I
moved to New York City from Washington, D.C. on August 26th,
2006. At first I rented out a shitty little room way up in Washington
Heights, before renting out a room way out in Queens.
For
the next three years, I would rise at 7 or 7:30am, catch a crowded
subway car down to the Tisch School of the Arts at 721 Broadway, and
spend 9am to 6pm doing breathing exercises, doing Alexander
technique, doing speech drills, doing movement work, crying, singing,
working on classical texts, crying some more, working on the likes of
Ibsen, Chekhov, Shaw, Shakespeare, Wilson, doing clown work, playing
theatre games and improv games, and crying. Then I would get an hour
for dinner. Then I would go to rehearsal from 7pm to 11pm. I probably
cried at some point during that time.
I
would then ride the train home and arrive at some time after midnight
and try to work on whatever texts I could for class the next day
before passing out and waking up 4 or 5 hours later, wearily jostling
for space on the crowded R train. And I would start the whole process
over again. Saturday was my day off. During the summers I was lucky
enough to work as an actor, even though I made no money and would
have to take out more loans in the coming school year. I never got a
break.
I
think that's as far from “commercial” a system of creating an
actor as you can get.
I
have colleagues that went to distinguished conservatories such as
Yale, Juilliard, and the American Conservatory Theatre, and we've all
pretty much gone through the ringer in the same way. And these
schools have been around for decades and have been gateways to
introducing us to many, many wonderful actors; some are household
names, many are not. But this idea that there is a “system” that
creates actors “commercially” in this country is simply wrong and
reveals an unfortunate ignorance on Ms. DuVernay's part in regards to
the high quality training many actors receive in this country.
It
seems that, in Ms. DuVernay's mind (and the minds of many, many
others who should know better), my being American is what bars me
from implementing “depth in character-building”.
The
irony in all this is that in Selma she cast two
Americans—Colman Domingo and Andre Holland, that have strong
theatrical backgrounds: the former broke through on Broadway and has
been working in New York (and London!!!) ever since, and the latter
is a graduate of the very same conservatory where I received my
training.
“There also is a cultural disconnect that allows actors like Oyelowo and Ejogo [who plays Coretta Scott-King in “Selma”] to strip down iconic figures like the Kings and play them with vulnerability and without falling into, say, the fear (and in some cases, the burden) that American actors steeped in historical traditions may have.“I’ve been trying to convince myself that being British has had no bearing on any of this, but actually I think that’s where it served me well,” Ejogo told BuzzFeed News. “I’m not as entrenched in the history so immediately. ... I didn’t know who Coretta was until I played her the first time. And I think I have permission — that’s the definition of the artist, in my opinion — to be a little deviant. It wasn’t as daunting as it might have been for an American actress. An African-American actress … that might have been a bit more of a challenge.”
This
is an interesting point, and I wish Ms. Carter had focused more on
this aspect: do we, as Black Americans, invest too much in our
history? Viola Davis, in an interview with Tavis Smiley, put it
brilliantly: “We, as African American artists, are moreconcerned with image and message and not execution”.
Ms.
Davis trained at Juilliard, by the way. I mean, it's no London
Academy of Music and Dramatic Art, but I think it's alright.
The
following is a quote from Mr. Oyelowo:
“We went to conservatoires to train for three years: We did classical theater; we did modern theater. I think that the reason why we’re having this moment we’re in right now, is because all of that hard work is now butting up against the time whereby a very big discernible appetite.”
Outside of the lack of a proof-reader, the most problematic part of this quote—which almost smacks of arrogance—is the implication that American actors are NOT receiving this type of training.
“I think people recognize with British actors that they do a lot of training, and I think people really respect that a lot of them have gone to places like Rose Bruford [College],” said [Naomi] Harris. “I went to the Bristol Old Vic Theatre School and trained for two years. They respect that we generally start off in theater and have a theater background. Film producers really like that.”
And
again, please see above. I, personally, have yet to meet a film (or
television) producer that regards my extensive theatrical resume as
an asset. To be frank, I think film producers really like that you're
British. Not to mention that actors like Morgan Freeman, Denzel Washington, and Samuel L. Jackson also started out in theatre.
At
some point a bit later in the article, which resumes the standard
promotional track regarding Selma
and portraying Dr. King, Oyelowo says “Even
though I’m not an American, I know what inequality feels like.” I'm being a bit unfair and taking this quote out of context, but I
find it fitting to include here, since I would argue that inequality
could also be an entire industry looking down on you because you are
not British.